Google
 

Saturday, December 29, 2007

SHARE CERTIFICATE AND SHARE WARRANT

4. Dividend coupon

5. In case of Private

Company

o. Stamp Duty

7. Rcstriction

8. Evidence

No dividend coupon is attached with a sharc certificate. Dividend is paid to the holder of a share certitieate by the issue of a dividend warrant in his favour.

A private as well as a public company can issue share certificate.

Stamp duty is payable on tmnster of shares.

There is no restriction on the issue of share certificate. Every shareholder will get at least one share certificate for

his holding in the company.

Share certiticate is a primalaeie evidence of title.

9. Qua Ii fi cat ion

IThe shares evidenced by the Shares. ccrtilieate are included in the Jualilieation shares of a director.

10. Name of the A share certificate asperities

Holder the name of the holder.119

Dividend coupon is attached with the share warrant. Dividend due on a share warrant is advertised in newspapers and is payable to the holder of the

share

warrant on presentation of such coupon.

A private comply cannot issue share warrant.

No stamp duty i payable on transfer of sharks.

A share warrant CIIl1 be issued subject to the conditions that Articles must

provide for the issue of warrant and the Central Government must approve the issue of warmth.

A share warrant is a conclusive evidence of the title if the transferee is a boated holder tor value.

Shares evidenced by a share warrant cannot be so included.

A share certificate docs not state the name of the holder. However, it specifics the number of shares held by the holder.

Every company-public or private is to maintain a Register of Members. Every person whose name is entered in the Register of Members is a member of

the company, whereas a person who holds shares of the company is a shareholder. Generally, these two terms-member and shareholder are used

interchangeably, but they differ in their legal terms. All shareholders are members and all members are shareholders expt in a few cases where these

two are not the same. For example, a holder of a share warrant is a shareholder but not a member of the company. On the other hand, a deceased

person is a member so long as his name is on the Register of Members whereas he cannot be termed as a shareholder.

the Importance of a Prospectus ‘! Is the issue of . prostates commissary on the part of a company

Prospectus means any document described or issued as a prospectus which has the object of inviting deposits from or inviting offers from the public for the subscription or purchase of shares in, or debentures of a company.

It is an invitation to the public for purchase of shares and debentures of the company. It informs the. Public about the company and stimulates people to invest money in the company.

2. It provides an authentic record of the bonus and conditions on which shares and debentures have been issued on the faith of prospectus, a person is induced to purchase shares in the company.

3. It identifies the persons who can be held responsible for miss

statements made in it. .

4. It reflects the business policies and programmers of the company. Is the issue of Precuts Compulsory’! No. issue of prospectus by

Thursday, December 27, 2007

Articles of Association deals with the management of a companies

The Articles of Association of a company lays down rules and regulations for its internal management. They are like the partnership deed in a partnership. They set out provisions for the manner in which the company is to be administered. The following observations of Lord Cairns are worth noting in this regard:
"The articles defines the duties, the rights, and the powers of the governing body as between themselves and the company at large, and the mode and the form in which the business of the company is to be carried on, and the mode and form in which changes in the internal regulations of the company may, from time to time, be made.Toms, the Articles of Association contains the rules and regulations which are framed for the internal management of the company. As this Section 2(2) of

the Companies Act defines 'Articles as "Articles of Association of a Company as originally framed or as altered from time to time in pursuance any previous Companies Act or this Act"
The Obligation to Register Articles, A public company limited by shares may register articles, while a company limited by guarantee or an unlimited company or a private company limited by shares must register articles 'with the memorandum at the time of registration. In other words, it is optional for a public company limited by share’s to register articles, whereas other types of companies are required to do so compulsorily (Section 26). If a public company limited by shares does no\register any articles, "Table A" (the model set of 99 articles given in the Schedule I at the end of the Companies Act) shall automatically apply to such, a company. Even if such a company register articles of its own, "Table A" will still apply automatically on all such matters

on which the said articles are silent unless its regulations have expressly been excluded by the company in its Articles.

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Salom & Co. Ltd. Acts

Salom & Co. Ltd. was formed with S, his wife, daughter and four sons as its sub 'brs and only members. The company took over the shoe business of Salo an (S) for £ 39,000 giving him in return 20,00 shares of one pound (£) ch and debentures worth £ 10,000 which created a charge on the comp assets and the balance in cash. All members, except S, purchased 0 share each. S and his two sons constituted the Board of Directors of th company. Due to general trade depression, the company went into liquid' on. The assets of the company amounted to £ 6,000 and its creditors to 7,000 (£ 10,000, secured by charge over the company' assets, and other cr ditors £ 7,000). S claimed the assets ofthe company because the assets secu d his debt. The other credItors contended that they should be paid in priori to S because the company and S were one and the same person. Held, that e company and S were two different legal persons and as such S was ens ed to the assets. In connection with the separate egal entity of the company, the following observation of Justice Kania a worth noting: "Under the law, an incorporated co pany is a distinct entity, and although all the shares may be practically trolled by one person, in law a company is a distinct entity and it is no ermissible or relevent to enquire whether the directors belonged to the s ne family or whether as compendious described, a 'As soon as a company is incorporated, it must e treated like any other independent person.Although a company is a legal person having with the country of its incorporation and a domicile in place or state of a citizen like a real person and therefore cannot claim protection a fundamental rights which are guaranteed to citizens only e.g. the right of ra '. However, they are sufficiently protected under the Constitution.
4. Limited Liability. As.a matter off act, it is the principal advantage of carrying the business under limited companies. A company may be limited by shares or by guarantee. In a company limited by shares, the liability of its members is limited to tlle nominal value of shares held by them. Thus, if the shares are not fully paid up, the member is liable to pay the amount remaining unpaid. The creditors of the company cannot take action against members of the
company to recover the amount due from the company. In the case of a company limited by guarantee, the liability of the members is limited upto the amount guaranteed by a member. .
5.We know that a company is a legal person in the eyes of law. It can, tllerefore, hold the property in its own name. All the property in the name of the company is it separate property which is controlled, managed and disposed of by the', company in its own name. Thus, the company is tile owner of its assets.; The members cannot claim to be the owner of the company's property., In India, this principle of separate property was best laid down by tlle
Supreme Court in Bachu F Guzdar Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay. The Supreme Court held that a shareholder is not the part owner ofthe company or its property, he is only given certain rights by law, e.g., to vote or attend meetings, to receive dividends.
6. Transfebility of Shares. The capital of a company' is divided into parts, and each part is called tile share. The shares of a company are freely transferable and can be purchased and sold in share market. This characteristic of a company is recognised by Section 82 of the Companies Act, which reads as under: "The shares or other interests of any member in a company shall be moveable property, transferable in the manner provided by the articles of the company". In other words, the shares of the company are transferable like movable property. However, in a private company, certain restrictions are placed on such tran:;fer of shares but th right to transfer is not taken away absolutely.
7. Common Seal. A company being an artificial person cannot sign its name on a contract, therefore, every company is required to have its own seal. The name of the company is engraved on it. The seal acts as the official signature of the company. The company shall be bound by only those documents on which this seal is affixed.
8. PCI-pctual Existence. Since a company has a separate legal entity, its existence is not affected by the death, insolvency, lunacy, etc. of its member. In the case of a company it may be said that the "members may come and members may go but the company can go on for ever". Even if all
its members die, the company would not cease to e On th death of members, the share held by them get transmitted in the name of their legal representatives who will then assume the membership ofthe company. As a company is created by the process oflaw, it can also be brought to an end by the procss of law. .
9. Separation of Ownership) and Management. A company is not managed by all its members but by their representatives. Thus, there is separation of ownership and management in it. Such an alternative is imperative in view of the large number of members in a company and the obvious difficulties involved in the matter ofentmsting the management to all of them. The representatives called directors are elected by the members in whom the ultimate
control of the company rests.